??? 01/12/10 22:09 Read: times |
#172391 - if it was mostly bit manipulation the 8052 may win. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Neil Kurzman said:
if it was mostly bit manipulation the 8052 may win. Only if the software had been carefully written to take advantage of the 8051's peculiar (in the polite sense) bit-manipulation faclities. As the code started on the MSP430, it is possible that this might not be the case - hence the 8051 code could be bigger than might otherwise be hoped... |
Topic | Author | Date |
Code Size Reduction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keil guidance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if you are not ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cross-post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try Hitex's C51 Primer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pardon? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I guess ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
my guess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Erik, your guess is correct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Your guess can't be correct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
but it can be the base of the statement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: The standard C51 program wastes a lot of memory | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
IAR Optimization | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
relative to Keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
! Apple 2 Apple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Apples and Oranges? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if 'identical' source, then ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The MSP430 has a bigger instruction set | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if it was mostly bit manipulation the 8052 may win.![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |