| ??? 01/12/10 14:01 Read: times |
#172366 - IAR Optimization Responding to: ???'s previous message |
With your original project being done with the IAR compiler it is not surprising that you have the smaller sized code. From my direct experience I can attest to how much the IAR tool chain can compress the code size down when all the optimizations are turned on.
Michael Karas |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Code Size Reduction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil guidance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if you are not ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cross-post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try Hitex's C51 Primer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pardon? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I guess ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my guess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Erik, your guess is correct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Your guess can't be correct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but it can be the base of the statement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The standard C51 program wastes a lot of memory | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IAR Optimization | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| relative to Keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ! Apple 2 Apple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Apples and Oranges? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if 'identical' source, then ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The MSP430 has a bigger instruction set | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if it was mostly bit manipulation the 8052 may win. | 01/01/70 00:00 |