| ??? 01/12/10 13:09 Read: times |
#172364 - I guess ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
David Prentice said:
The standard C51 program wastes a lot of memory by skipping a large block. What do you mean by that? I guess it means that too many programmers just use the large memory model for convenience and completely forget about the costs it incurs. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Code Size Reduction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil guidance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if you are not ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cross-post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try Hitex's C51 Primer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pardon? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I guess ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my guess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Erik, your guess is correct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Your guess can't be correct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but it can be the base of the statement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The standard C51 program wastes a lot of memory | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IAR Optimization | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| relative to Keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ! Apple 2 Apple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Apples and Oranges? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if 'identical' source, then ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The MSP430 has a bigger instruction set | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if it was mostly bit manipulation the 8052 may win. | 01/01/70 00:00 |