| ??? 11/30/09 09:49 Read: times |
#171316 - RE: An Assembler ... uses a markedly different syntax... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
there is an assembler that turns up here from time-to-ime and uses a markedly different syntax from the "normal" 8051 assemblers.
IIRC, it's a "multi-purpose" assembler - not just for 8051s... I think this is the one I was thinking of: http://www.8052.com/forum/read/110417 Phillip M Gallo said:
What i noticed was that the assembler [Psuedo-Sam] used the Motorola scheme for psuedo-ops and constant declaration and the like.
If this is what you like or are used to no big deal but if you are going to import code from other 8051 examples you'll find the intel assembler approach seems to be far more standard and as such you'll do less "re-typing" if you use the MetaLink or Keil assembler both of which have more compatibility with intel's original As51 assembler. http://www.8052.com/forum/read/110450 Or maybe this: http://www.8052.com/forum/read/9732 |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| I need help locating an old assembler... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try anything | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SXA51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agree with Steve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The Beauty of Assembler Language | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| May have different mnemonics and operator orders | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A change of syntax... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| non-intel-ish assembler... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: An Assembler ... uses a markedly different syntax... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Here's the one I like, and it's MACRO assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Off Subject | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Completely on subject example why even mnemonics may differ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
GNU as and '51 | 01/01/70 00:00 |