Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
10/10/09 03:37
Read: times


 
Msg Score: -1
 -1 Looks like homework		 #169611 - Is this Code Correct for 16 Bit Serial Transmission
Hello,
i have created a code for data transmission through RS232. But as i have made it for 16 bit serial.


ORG 000H
JMP MAIN
ORG 023H
JMP SERIAL
ORG 030H
MAIN:
MOV SCON,#50H
MOV TMOD,#20H
MOV TH1,#-24
SETB TR1
SETB EA
SETB ES
MOV R1,#01
MOV DPTR,#0000H
MOV SBUF,DPH
JMP$

SERIAL:
CLR TI
DJNZ R2,SKIP
MOV R2,#02
MOV SBUF,DPL
INC DPTR
RETI
SKIP:
MOV SBUF,DPH
RETI

END



Thanks

List of 26 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Is this Code Correct for 16 Bit Serial Transmission            01/01/70 00:00      
   No.            01/01/70 00:00      
      Sir            01/01/70 00:00      
         Insert program code            01/01/70 00:00      
            How to post legible source code            01/01/70 00:00      
            Who would bother to read uncommented code?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Worse than that            01/01/70 00:00      
         So you will understand            01/01/70 00:00      
   what code?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Program with comments            01/01/70 00:00      
         The first after it            01/01/70 00:00      
            Second after it.......            01/01/70 00:00      
               Simulators            01/01/70 00:00      
               Remove all the silly code lines!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Comments first, then discussing intention/reality            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Careful Commenting Catches Cruddy Coding!            01/01/70 00:00      
            So where did all the comments go?!            01/01/70 00:00      
               To achieve 16 bit communication            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Exactly what was your "target"?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  How?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Return from interrupt            01/01/70 00:00      
               Of course not            01/01/70 00:00      
                  But how it could be different            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Any more information required            01/01/70 00:00      
                        As previously stated            01/01/70 00:00      
                           and summarised...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List