| ??? 08/21/09 13:14 Read: times |
#168443 - Isn't that what stop bits are for? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
so far so (almost) good, BUT I have seen 9600 receivers that could not keep up so "if you run with a high baudrate" is superfluous Isn't that what stop bits are for, to give the receive additional time for processing? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Time delay in serial communication | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Normally none | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Per got carried away | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Isn't that what stop bits are for? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HUH? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FIFO allows more jitter in response times | 01/01/70 00:00 |