| ??? 04/28/09 13:31 Read: times |
#164903 - consider it, Mr. Neil Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Mr. Andy Neil,
why do you use such type of language (somewhat rude and humiliating). can you not tell the things in simpler language? you have used such type of language in previous replies. Andy Neil said:
Look at the documentation for the particular compiler that you are using - to see its recommendation.
Look at the manufacturer's website for the particular chip you are using - to see if they provide a header. Amit Mittal said:
is only 8952.h is enough or some more/less files are needed? Just the name of a file tells us virtually nothing! You at least need to say what compiler (and version) it came with, or where else you got it from. Or, you can just look at it and see if it defines everything you need; it's just a header file the same as any other header file - nothing magic or special about it! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| header file for at89s52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| consider it, Mr. Neil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The more specific original q, the more specific answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| before deciding Andy was 'rude', did you ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to those who replied to me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What unwanted comments? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| see this line for "unwanted comment" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It means just that - nothing magic or special about it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It means exactly what it says | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thank you sir for your help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| state, at least, ONE case of ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| check out the differences between 8052 and 'S52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thank you Mr.Jan Waclawek for this information | 01/01/70 00:00 |