??? 11/17/13 14:50 Read: times |
#190148 - That was kind of my point Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
I've never seen a potentiometer specsheet or whatever other material may there be, which would go beyond the power specs and max voltage. They invariantly assume the potentiometer is used as a voltage divider with no load on the wiper. Yes, that was kind of my point: if they had intended them to be used in applications where it mattered, then they would have specified it. I certainly wouldn't expect to get any such help for cheap, "commodity" components. If anything, you would need to be looking at specialist (read, "more expensive") parts. I guess it might be more likely to be included for parts which are specified for higher powers anyhow...? |
Topic | Author | Date |
Power rating of potentiometers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
show me such | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
(was) incorrect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not your average "pot" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Specs that are not normally told.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
power | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
test bench vs field design | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That was kind of my point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pot limits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
While I don't disagree ... there are different failure modes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bourns says: "yes." | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tesla says: no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
cermet or wirewound | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No big difference, if it all | 01/01/70 00:00 |