??? 05/21/12 07:49 Read: times |
#187455 - No - generic isn't meaningful Responding to: ???'s previous message |
And you have already received the generic answers - but generic answers have to stay at the C language view, since we have already established that everything can end up in RAM as one extreme, and in the other direction, a single class (for example DATA) can be split and placed in a number of different memory address spaces like on the 8051.
After all - what is the generic answer to: what is his name? No one can answer, without knowing who "he" is. And we can't talk about memory regions without knowing compiler + target architecture. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Memory Organization | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tried any good C book lately? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I am using Dennis Ritchie_ANCI C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Variables don't move just because you assign to them | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
can we start from ZERO........ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Have you read my original post? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
mixing stuff | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
where it will be for MCU? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
is there any book for this fundamental things? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
In this a general or Specific Question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
its General Que ???? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Separate "the C view of program" from "microcontroller view" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
NO! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why not?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No - generic isn't meaningful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Interview questions can be asked out of limited knowledge | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Seldom "one" answer other than to trivial questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
In Addition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Embedded? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sometimes, usually | 01/01/70 00:00 |