| ??? 03/24/12 14:35 Read: times |
#186859 - Yes, and you need ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You need to have two internally triggered channels, AND and external trigger input. Few multimeters offer that combination. Delayed sweep is a useful feature, too. I could go on.
It's more likely one will find a reasonably-priced analog 'scope of the appropriate (>=100 MHz) bandwidth capable of displaying those troublesome <10 ns glitches, than a digital one. The digital 'scopes generally do have the advantage, however, of being able to store a waveform, which none of my analog 'scopes can do at full bandwidth. RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| ultrasonic receiver problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You really, really need to get an oscilloscope! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The joys of working blind | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The same way ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How do you fry an egg with a sledge hammer? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| First? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| First, and always. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you cannot afford a scope... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This is a kind of dip meter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you are still in trouble | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| On-line simulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You need to save up for a scope! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Microcontroller | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re You need to save up for a scope! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, perhaps that's the solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| %$#@! -- it happened again! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Multimeters can't troubleshoot everything | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, and you need ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |