| ??? 10/15/11 08:30 Read: times |
#184209 - Shouldn't need a disassembler fo that Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
when wondering what your C code is doing, the disassemble window in the emulator can be quite useful. Richard Erlacher said:
I can believe that this function can be useful. You shouldn't need a dis-assembler for that - most compilers will give a listing of the assembler that they've generated. (also, the Keil Linker will give a listing when it has adjusted the code with link-time optimisations). That way you can see where you might want to fiddle with the resulting ASM code Rather than tinkering, it'd probably be better to use it to identify parts that should be taken out of 'C' altogether, and written entirely in hand-optimised assembler... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Disassemblers are they really that good? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| worthless | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It depends on what you want ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wishes of Birthday | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Disassemblers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't think it's that bad ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one good 'disassembler' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That has to be handy! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Shouldn't need a disassembler fo that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code profiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Profiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Only as good as the information they have to work on | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I though this tool would teach me something about binary fil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keep in mind what a disassembler is ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |