??? 10/11/11 04:38 Read: times |
#184174 - I don't think it's that bad ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
These are just tools, and, to some extent, the serve a purpose. If you have a body of code that you simply want to move to another region of memory, a disassembled version might serve. It won't do all the work, but it will, for a simple task like that, help out.
How much additional help you can extract from a disassembled program is really up to you. No, you can't build a steak, but you can still exercise considerable flexibility, as I once did with a disassembled version of a debug monitor. Frankly, I haven't used a "real" disassembler very often, but the one built into that disassembler, just as in the old MSDOS DEBUG, is quite handy. RE |
Topic | Author | Date |
Disassemblers are they really that good? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
worthless | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It depends on what you want ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wishes of Birthday | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Disassemblers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I don't think it's that bad ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
one good 'disassembler' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That has to be handy! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Shouldn't need a disassembler fo that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Code profiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Profiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Only as good as the information they have to work on | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I though this tool would teach me something about binary fil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keep in mind what a disassembler is ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |