| ??? 10/05/11 09:28 Read: times |
#184047 - Yes, but... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Yes it is, in the way that Andy describes, but it doesn't explicitly state (within the example) that if you don't use 'static' that the data won't be there when you go to use it. I should have made the link myself, but missed it. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Another static question... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| WIthout Static In This Case | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is worse than that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| could add 'const' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's the key! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks Neil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| True - but not quite the point here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| isn't it explained in the book itself? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, it is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If the pupil does not understand... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In this instance... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That is why the call it learning. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| isn't this just another example of .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Information-hiding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not arguing that part | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not just protection. Also better overview (and reuse) | 01/01/70 00:00 |