??? 10/04/11 17:01 Read: times |
#184028 - Thank you Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Thanks Michael, that makes perfect sense. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Another static question... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
WIthout Static In This Case | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It is worse than that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
could add 'const' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's the key! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks Neil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
True - but not quite the point here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
isn't it explained in the book itself? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, it is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If the pupil does not understand... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
In this instance... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That is why the call it learning. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
isn't this just another example of .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Information-hiding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not arguing that part | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not just protection. Also better overview (and reuse) | 01/01/70 00:00 |