Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/12/11 09:05
Read: times


 
#183319 - KISS
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I'm all in favour of KISS. The 37 command bytes are more less arbitrarily chosen, so recoding them with a greater hamming distance is the simplest solution I can think of. Sending 2 bytes actually requires more complicated code, although it's obviously still relatively simple.

The goal is to maximise robustness in an industrial environment where ESD and fast transients might cause bit errors. As we don't know the BER, we are just looking for generic ruggedness without added cost.

List of 13 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Error detecting codes over RS232            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: increase the error detection capability            01/01/70 00:00      
      How complex?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Hamming distance            01/01/70 00:00      
         Hamming distance really not a good choice            01/01/70 00:00      
            KISS            01/01/70 00:00      
               Transfer size?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Transfer Size ---            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Parameter free            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Transfer Size ---            01/01/70 00:00      
   double command and CR            01/01/70 00:00      
      a bit more involved and better            01/01/70 00:00      
      Double Characters...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List