| ??? 08/11/11 06:21 Read: times |
#183294 - Hamming distance Responding to: ???'s previous message |
That's the one! Using two bytes has been suggested using the simple relationship that the second byte is the complement of the first, but that just seems rather progligate and brute force for just 37 commands. There is intelligence at the master end, so using ASCII printable bytes is just a convenience for development and test. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Error detecting codes over RS232 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: increase the error detection capability | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How complex? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hamming distance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hamming distance really not a good choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| KISS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Transfer size? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Transfer Size --- | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Parameter free | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Transfer Size --- | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| double command and CR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a bit more involved and better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Double Characters... | 01/01/70 00:00 |