| ??? 05/28/10 17:14 Read: times |
#176270 - SILabs generated language confusion Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Excellent, because the F005's internal oscillator is not good enough
It is, when controlled by a crystal SILabs is the source of much confusion because they use the term "internal oscillator" not for "the internal oscillator", but for "the internal oscillator running w/o a crystal". Thus I found a quartz does not mean that he is not using the internal oscillator but using "the internal oscillator controlled by crystal". Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| UART and crystal oscillator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| be clear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Already discussed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Definitely depends on processor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| we do not even know ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Internal crystal oscillator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| UART with internal oscillator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Philips had one ... SCC2691 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maxim? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NXP (Philips) AN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C8051F005 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: C8051F005 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SILabs generated language confusion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: confusing | 01/01/70 00:00 |