| ??? 05/20/10 14:46 Read: times |
#176073 - RE: the word Andy will be so kind to supply... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
There is nothing which prevents the programmer to write malicious or [the word Andy will be so kind to supply for the unintentional counterpart of malicious] function/variable/constant/whatever names. Actually, I can't think of a word just at the moment! I'd put it like this: I would have said:
There is nothing which prevents the programmer from writing misleading and/or inaccurate function/variable/constant/whatever names - whether maliciously or not. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| When comments go wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Always document what the code is doing or the weather | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do you have some examples of that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I've never seen anything like that ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do it like a pro. ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the dubious value of comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: not subject to any scrutiny of the compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| limited vocabulary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| dubious | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Please remove baby from bathwater before disposal! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good selection of symbol names helps a lot | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| variable/function names can be misleading too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: the word Andy will be so kind to supply... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dodgy premise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's no fun. | 01/01/70 00:00 |