| ??? 03/04/10 17:54 Read: times |
#173861 - I'm not defending Responding to: ???'s previous message |
It was not my intent to defend either the bad code or the lazy guy. Come on, I just gave an example where & when a faulty code just might prove to be a lucky perfect shot for someone, the original topic of discussion!
no, if he has any smarts, he would reject the offer. hmmm... then there are 99% chances that someone else buys it & demonstrates & gets a better grade than him. And then the smart guy puts the blame on Murphy... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Is it "lucky" or "unlucky" when bad code runs "correctly" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I vote UNlucky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Unlucky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| unlucky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| very unlucky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Very unlucky. At least during testing. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bugs happen | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| certainly unlucky but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But it would be very unlucky... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That is a very good point... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| recalling a non-aberrant behavior | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just a matter of chance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you do not know Murphy was an optimist? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm not defending | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| considering ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I disagree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not really | 01/01/70 00:00 |