??? 03/04/10 08:07 Read: times |
#173824 - certainly unlucky but... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
...it depends, whether your'e a newbie, then you just might consider yourself lucky if it worked, althought that "luck" will soon turn out to be a much bigger headache in the long run.
It can be considered lucky if you just want your code to "appear" to work. Excellent example is a typical college project, if your code works on the D-day, it's certainly lucky, who cares later if the code was flawed or whatever. ;-) |
Topic | Author | Date |
Is it "lucky" or "unlucky" when bad code runs "correctly" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I vote UNlucky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Unlucky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
unlucky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
very unlucky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Very unlucky. At least during testing. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bugs happen | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
certainly unlucky but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
But it would be very unlucky... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That is a very good point... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
recalling a non-aberrant behavior | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Just a matter of chance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you do not know Murphy was an optimist? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm not defending | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
considering ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I disagree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not really | 01/01/70 00:00 |