| ??? 12/09/09 16:09 Read: times |
#171529 - State of the art/market? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Joseph Hebert said:
The distinction between a touch sensor and a proximity sensor is that you don't need to physically touch a proximity detector. You just need to get close to whatever metal it is in contact with (in our case, a safe). That would address any problem with people wearing gloves. Indeed. Some claim that their capacitive sensing implementations can do proximity sensing. I would suggest you do more searching with these terms and see what you can find. The point of my question was not to find all the solutions that are available - as you say, google can do that. And each one will, of course, be selling itself as the "best". What I was after was some qualitative and/or quantitative comparisons of the various available implementations. A kind of review of the state of the art and/or the state of the market |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Touch Sense Solutions - which is best? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not a dirct answer, but relevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cypress has a line... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SILabs too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No-touch sense | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| State of the art/market? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| USB flash - which is the best? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FSR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a discussion of the pros & cons | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You might get some comparisions here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Overview | 01/01/70 00:00 |