Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/23/08 05:03
Read: times


 
#155051 - Sorry to step on your toes ...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
There's no way a local protocol of any sort would help in this case because (a) dumb terminals don't provide/support them and (b) having to switch with in the current phase of a 33 MHz clock would probably not allow for much action by the MCU.

I need a handshaking trick that will, at least under some circumstances, be meaningful beyond just reporting a garbled ASCII character. If there's a dumb terminal there, it wouldn't know what to do anyway, and will probably just echo some error character, though if there's something intelligent at the remote end, perhaps some convenient manipulation of the handshake tags (CTS, RTS, DSR, DTR, RLSD, etc.) would illicit a useful response.

Since I'm not given to using low (<10Mbps) transmission rates, generally speaking, I'm not "up" on the latest alchemy with otherwise unprescribed handshaking on RS232. I could, conceivably accommodate some simple sort of thing, but I absolutely need to signal that the channel is momentarily closed, and, of course, when it is, once again, available. Most often, one can tolerate a single missing/damaged character. With a quick hardware signal, it should be possible to signal change of status such that no additional ASCII characters are sent.

My hope was that someone had a "clue" how one might effect such a feat. If it's too big a challenge, I'll just delete the async serial channel.

RE





List of 13 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Asynchronous Serial Port handshake?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Question isn\'t quite clear            01/01/70 00:00      
   Thie problem is exactly analogous to,,,            01/01/70 00:00      
      Protocol? "We don't need no %$#@! protocol!"            01/01/70 00:00      
         Good Luck            01/01/70 00:00      
            Sorry to step on your toes ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   'right now'            01/01/70 00:00      
   sounds to be a case for an external UART...            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE sounds to be a case for an external UART...            01/01/70 00:00      
      double post, ignore            01/01/70 00:00      
      It could be none at all ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Switch            01/01/70 00:00      
      The goal is to minimize the data loss            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List