| ??? 04/28/08 16:47 Read: times |
#154118 - Why a seperate CAN Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Why Not. Yes an optimal design will use a built in CAN. A lot of pluses there. But for a hobby or low volume project it maybe better to use tools you have handy. microchip makes the chips so they must be selling them to somebody.
Hobbyist like DIP packages. They are easier to work with. And disappearing fast. So making that number one criteria may not be a good idea. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| CAN with Flash and RAM? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Silabs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Protocol? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SILabs has sample code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Great answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I guess I know by another name, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PDIP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| so I guessed right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Plasticl Dual-Inline Package | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| spidol? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| there could be some with built-in CAN in DIP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why a seperate CAN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| They have 6 chips | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| They have 6 chips ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have never used them | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| With only AT89S5X or DS89C4x0 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i think you answered that yourself | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ask the Data Sheet | 01/01/70 00:00 |