| ??? 02/08/08 08:10 Modified: 02/08/08 08:13 Read: times |
#150455 - But the manufacturer is ASSUMING !. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
Ap Charles said: When bench mark after 24hrs is being set then it is ASSUMED by the manufacturing people that the 376ppmco2 level is there. No, that's not true at all - read Oliver's post again: Oliver Sedlacek said:
If the CO2 level is 600 ppm for more than 24 hours, then this is not a suitable detector. But the manufacturer is ASSUMING !. Say you install the sensor for office use , then take for example there is some Co2 leakage source from some where ( just bear with me ) . Now this time his sensor goes to benchmark calibration mode and it definitely fails . AP |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| F i g a r o gas sensor question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Makes sense to me... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it will not work as we expect ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Please read the datasheet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| little confusion.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Gas detection conventions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How can manufacturer be so confidant ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Misinterpretation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But the manufacturer is ASSUMING !. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still missing the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Then you would get an ? .. we are talking about | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| while the above post does not make much sense .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That may be a mercaptan sensor :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I know all that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
These are already part | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hence the warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm working on a gas .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Flammable | 01/01/70 00:00 |