Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/16/07 14:16
Read: times


 		 #143349 - 18 cycles
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Meantime, Juergen Christoph posted an another version of the "algorithmic" CRC-CCITT into the code library - and it's 1 cycle better than mine! (21 cycles, if the "Keil-compatibility" is off - I did not count but Juergen did - it's said in the "header")

This is the sort of challenge I like, of course, so I added a new one into the code library file, this time 18 cycles (I had to press the "refresh" button in the browser to see the new file not the old one from cache). It does not use B, but does use R0 (or R1 if someone want). I did not attempt to be Keil-compatible, though...

JW


List of 32 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
CRC16 CCITT - What a challenge!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Have you seen this?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Of course!            01/01/70 00:00      
         Balance            01/01/70 00:00      
            I know, Russ,            01/01/70 00:00      
         Code? What code?            01/01/70 00:00      
            in the code library - look to the left column            01/01/70 00:00      
               Thanks! I missed that note in the first post.            01/01/70 00:00      
   I need a hint            01/01/70 00:00      
      write down the bits            01/01/70 00:00      
         Thanks for the hint            01/01/70 00:00      
            Your observations plus a comparison in C            01/01/70 00:00      
               The rest of the story ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Compilers, but Keil C51 8.09 for the stated 28~            01/01/70 00:00      
                  and this processes only a nibble, isn't it...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     No, it process the entire byte.            01/01/70 00:00      
                        now it\'s my pencil time...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           FYFI            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Clarification re: 8-bit optimized term            01/01/70 00:00      
                              on optimisation            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Jan's optimization            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Re: on optimization            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Can you please be more specific?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          More specifically ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            and what            01/01/70 00:00      
               More on checksums            01/01/70 00:00      
   No reason to hide the excreted code            01/01/70 00:00      
      Excreted code needs context like any other code            01/01/70 00:00      
   One More Comment            01/01/70 00:00      
      ... and a marginal remark ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Init all ones frequently specified            01/01/70 00:00      
   18 cycles            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List