Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread

??? 08/13/07 18:59 Read: times	#143213 - No, it process the entire byte. Responding to: ???'s previous message

List of 32 messages in thread

Topic	Author	Date
CRC16 CCITT - What a challenge!		01/01/70 00:00
Have you seen this?		01/01/70 00:00
Of course!		01/01/70 00:00
Balance		01/01/70 00:00
I know, Russ,		01/01/70 00:00
Code? What code?		01/01/70 00:00
in the code library - look to the left column		01/01/70 00:00
Thanks! I missed that note in the first post.		01/01/70 00:00
I need a hint		01/01/70 00:00
write down the bits		01/01/70 00:00
Thanks for the hint		01/01/70 00:00
Your observations plus a comparison in C		01/01/70 00:00
The rest of the story ...		01/01/70 00:00
Compilers, but Keil C51 8.09 for the stated 28~		01/01/70 00:00
and this processes only a nibble, isn't it...		01/01/70 00:00
No, it process the entire byte.		01/01/70 00:00
now it\'s my pencil time...		01/01/70 00:00
FYFI		01/01/70 00:00
Clarification re: 8-bit optimized term		01/01/70 00:00
on optimisation		01/01/70 00:00
Jan's optimization		01/01/70 00:00
Re: on optimization		01/01/70 00:00
Can you please be more specific?		01/01/70 00:00
More specifically ...		01/01/70 00:00
and what		01/01/70 00:00
More on checksums		01/01/70 00:00
No reason to hide the excreted code		01/01/70 00:00
Excreted code needs context like any other code		01/01/70 00:00
One More Comment		01/01/70 00:00
... and a marginal remark ...		01/01/70 00:00
Init all ones frequently specified		01/01/70 00:00
18 cycles		01/01/70 00:00

Back to Subject List