| ??? 05/13/07 12:40 Read: times |
#139174 - Addition to the 80C154 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
And I did not find this in other data sheets of other 8051 derivatives. So what does that tell me? Is it wrong or right then? Well, I don't know. Best is, just try it on a real processor. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| as a curiousity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Initial reaction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I submit plenty of assembler and | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| miscomm? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bob, clearly you need to read on port latches in t | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| interesting, however | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Did you mean courtesy? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm not corious | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this is why the \"adult\" ICEs are for... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no ICE I know of can show the port LATCH | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Optimise? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now, as discussion of optimization started | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Addition to the 80C154 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I would never ASS U ME | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that OKI part... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is a true 51 derivative, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
are you sure? | 01/01/70 00:00 |