| ??? 05/12/07 14:22 Read: times |
#139105 - sure Responding to: ???'s previous message |
An optimisation:
I show a piece of scribbles to get the port latch read on a temporary, for debuugubg purposes only basis and you are, indeed right, that what you show is more efficient, were it to be actually used in 'running code'. However, as posted, if you need to know the port latch a shadww register is THE solution. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| as a curiousity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Initial reaction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I submit plenty of assembler and | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| miscomm? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bob, clearly you need to read on port latches in t | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| interesting, however | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Did you mean courtesy? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm not corious | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this is why the \"adult\" ICEs are for... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no ICE I know of can show the port LATCH | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Optimise? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now, as discussion of optimization started | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Addition to the 80C154 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I would never ASS U ME | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that OKI part... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is a true 51 derivative, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
are you sure? | 01/01/70 00:00 |