??? 05/12/07 17:48 Read: times |
#139130 - It's always going to be used ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If you watch the processes run, you'll see that the software always expands all the product terms, reduces them to SOP format, and then reduces them, regardless of how hard you've worked to express them efficiently. In some cases, because of the device architecture, it partitions the function for fit into a single LUT. When that doesn't work, it partitions it to fit multiple LUT's, or macrocells.
The software that does that has been around for >25 years. It's pretty reliable. Certainly more reliable than anything that normally is used for things under Windows. RE |
Topic | Author | Date |
XOR using NAND | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Implemented in what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Its just self study.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
as I said REDRAW IT | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Do the algebra! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Got That. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
For Future Reference | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank You! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Back-to-Basics: DeMorgan's Theorem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
this is all obvious, aside from the missing detail | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Detail provided | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
confusing ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I think | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I can see that, I guess. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, easily conceivable... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
there are many ways to skin a cat | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If you trust... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I have some swampland in Florida to sell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's always going to be used ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, you will hardly find 4 NANDs, in fact | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
redraw | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You must expand some terms... | 01/01/70 00:00 |