| ??? 04/30/07 13:51 Read: times |
#138286 - of course not Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You don't always want your compiler to strictly adhere to the ansi standard.
of course not, what I stated is that if it does not it need be an option unless the compiler is staed explicitly as non-compliant I enable several "make the compiler different from the standard" options when compiling for the '51`, the point is they must be options requiring enabling or the compiler can not claim ANSI compliance. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Quick C enumerated types question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not to worry i've found out anyway. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's a "quick C" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The answer was..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| as has been discussed before | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| of course not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not true | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C99 says | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not any more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In C99 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Enumeration type vs. constant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks for that everyone | 01/01/70 00:00 |