| ??? 01/08/07 19:53 Read: times |
#130452 - Yes, guilty! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik said:
One TBD I often see is max Idd or Icc and those - not knowledge, but 'good guess' - will be related to transistor leakage. again - not knowledge, but 'good guess' - I would assume that particular value can vary quite a bit from fab to fab (e.g. precise enough litography vs much better lithography) without any adverse effect on the performance of the chip (except, of course, in battery powered apps).
Kai, you take the specific (as in your examples above) and make it global. Yes, you are right, I confess myself guilty. But why can this damned manufacturer not wait until he knows what his chip does in detail?? Why all this guessing and fiddeling arround with assumptions, excuses, intentions, proposals and all these shitty and superflous phone calls and e-mails... Kai |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| What is TBD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Be Determined | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Or Decided, or Defined, or... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| offen I see the word | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The true meaning of TBD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sticky situations... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, "clue", not "glue". Thanks! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Or... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I once asked | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And you believe it to be true? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TBD, in anything other than an objective spec. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 120% agree!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a rewrite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, guilty! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my guess again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The problem is "time-to-market" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that would be even worse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, live with the part, maybe, the vendor, never! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
datasheet lifecycle | 01/01/70 00:00 |