??? 09/15/06 21:11 Read: times |
#124374 - Bad karma Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"I remember one of the idiotics with a soft reset that did a soft reset on an error condition. What he missed was that, occsionally, the runaway set some SFR that he "did not need to initilaize because he did not use it" and all hell broke lose because the "soft reset" did not restore it to the initial value."
Yeah I see this even in the Config Wizards or Code Architects where they |= an initial config value into a register leaving all the other bits unchanged. Which is fine only as long as all the other bits are in the known and proper state. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Soft reset in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you can't do it with a jump anyhow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No dog | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Very soft | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That was for Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Explanation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I try to explain. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Incorrect comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is it a call? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yuk | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the good thing about C is... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LOL, made my day - thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and that's how | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
_asm ljmp 0x0000 _endasm; | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
goto in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
goto scope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
slow??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Slow? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The simple way to do reset in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I don't think so... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that is NOT a \'reset\' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
C wizard: Dan Saks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that is not what's tricky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bad karma | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nothing wrong with that after a hard reset | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Mix Asysmbly | 01/01/70 00:00 |