??? 08/16/06 14:28 Read: times |
#122345 - We are living in a TTL world... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard said:
What's the benefit of pulling down rather than pulling up the one currently driven row/column? When using TTL compatible chips and rather high pulling resistors, then only a low strobing scheme can be used, just because the low state is so much closer to signal ground than high state to Vcc. So, with a rather high pull-up resistor, we can accept much higher injected noise, when no switch contact is closed, than we could, when strobing high and using pull-down resistors. Even, if this noise issue would be rather irrelevant, one would always strobe low with TTL compatibles, from tradition and intuition... With ideal CMOS parts, where the trip threshold is exactly Vcc/2, where the noise margins, the source and input impedances are identical, there is no difference whether strobing high or low. But take care, CMOS chips aren't entirely symmterical in reality! 74HCMOS, for instance, has a bigger high state noise margin (to easier accept 74LSTTL and 74ALSTTL?), so that in most cases even with CMOS a low strobing is advantageous. Kai |
Topic | Author | Date |
High or Low in keypad scanner? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PNP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe with TTL, but what about CMOS? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I would not, the user does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that depends on how you scan the inputs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
physical/technological reasons | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What sorts of reasons? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
early MOS technology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe they did it... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oxymoron! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you spoilt my joke now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Jokes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
We are living in a TTL world... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I don't know why this interests me, but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a proverbial answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So you figure it's just a matter of preference? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You really should get out more! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, it's a second childhood ... or maybe a third | 01/01/70 00:00 |