| ??? 05/03/06 22:44 Read: times |
#115509 - "Pseudo-Op" ??? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Has the syntax in the industry changed so much that there's confusion about what, 40 years ago, was called a pseudo-op?
It's clearly an assembler directive, not intended to generate code, but to affect or define the code that's generated, like ORG for example. RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| using memory | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1) what is the problem 2) as always, the | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not in the "bible"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oh well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 16 limit? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Exactly! It's assembler syntax. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pseudo Instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pseudo Instruction? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Pseudo-Op" ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Blur | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Top marks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
movc | 01/01/70 00:00 |