??? 03/17/06 14:19 Read: times |
#112390 - there are niche applications... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... where the "hardware" solution is superior to the "sub$1 LPC" and akind.
Also, one can perhaps want to compare the expected endurance to harsh environment, long-term reliability, probability of bug in FW, and such. The "hardware" solution might turn out to be better in these respects. But, I stress again, such requirements are quite rare and the "sub$1 LPC" is a valid solution probably most of the time. Jan Waclawek PS. The SC16IS752's are to be sold for around $2-3 in volume according to Philips and are quoted at $5.something at Avnet (but I don't know what is the volume basis for that, I suspect 1). |
Topic | Author | Date |
I2C-Connected UART? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AFAIK, not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Philips | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why not a sub $1 LPC with HW IIC and UAR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why not indeed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and not only for UARTS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Multiprocessing is a wonderful thing! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
multiprocessing: master/slave | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
there are niche applications... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sub $1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The only thing I see you missing (and I | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Multi-UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
functionality | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
roll your own | 01/01/70 00:00 |