| ??? 02/09/06 01:58 Read: times |
#109569 - No Responding to: ???'s previous message |
It just seems that PICs fit the bill better lately. I wanted to have something "better" next time a project comes along.
Just thinking out loud. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| What is like a PIC16F877 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| stupid magazine .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| be realistic, guys | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Really advantageous? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| an answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| multi-chip option | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that would require | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I had a look into PIC16F87x datasheet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sounds a lot like a LPC93x | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| match | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That is one of the toughest changeover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes It does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What I use... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Because | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Internal ADC uses | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DSPIC | 01/01/70 00:00 |