| ??? 12/04/11 15:09 Read: times |
#185014 - I personally don't need full C99 compliance Responding to: ???'s previous message |
...but the really useful and backward compatible stuff like the headers stdint.h and stdbool.h would help alot. Same goes for the possibilty to declare variables within blocks, basically any location within a function and ofcourse the keyword inline.
I don't see any feature there that would fail on a 8051. SDCC does it, so can do Keil, esp as their compiler really is great in all other aspects. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| stdint.h for Keil C? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ! StdInt.h | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Make one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ofcourse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC's headers can be adapted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's the problem... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So just write one! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Does Keil claim C99 compliance at all? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| They have a statement on this... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C90 conformance - not C99. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I personally don't need full C99 compliance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes possible. But maybe not economical. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not difficult | 01/01/70 00:00 |