| ??? 12/04/11 09:25 Read: times |
#185012 - SDCC's headers can be adapted Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The stdint.h from SDCC seems to work ok however I personally would not trust the pointer types and widths.
However in a context of a 8051 MCU, I’d rather introduce my own data type for pointers anyway due to the different possible memory spaces. A generic pointer will have to carry section information that has to be evaluated at runtime. A special typed pointer won’t waste as many resources. The stdbool.h from SDCC can be used as well. Just make sure to be Keil compatible and use the following definitions: #define _Bool bit #define BOOL bit #define bool _Bool #define __bool_true_false_are_defined 1 I leave the task of copying and/or adopting the files as an exercise to the readers. It works for me to have bool, and *int_*_t types at hand. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| stdint.h for Keil C? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ! StdInt.h | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Make one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ofcourse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC's headers can be adapted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's the problem... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So just write one! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Does Keil claim C99 compliance at all? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| They have a statement on this... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C90 conformance - not C99. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I personally don't need full C99 compliance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes possible. But maybe not economical. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not difficult | 01/01/70 00:00 |