| ??? 04/19/11 13:26 Read: times |
#181952 - Answer Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I admit that I was careless in my suggestion in this thread. I humbly apologize.
Andy and Per are Gurus, and they are right, all is clear, there's nothing personal and as a novice, I have nothing else to say. Per, Andy, Thank you for your advices. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89c55 Connection with ULN2803/4 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There is a FAQ for that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MAX1232 + some NORs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| #181903 - AT89c55 Connection with ULN2803/4 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| '595 Chip /OE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pull-downs... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 89C55 connection with 2803 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why is Atmel different? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why 89CXX is different | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Advice not understood | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You didn't answer the question! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not necessarily because of AT89 | 01/01/70 00:00 |