| ??? 04/19/11 07:21 Read: times |
#181947 - Why is Atmel different? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jusman Sulaiman said:
The ports Atmel 89CXX microprocessor, unlike the (sic) 80C31 or 80C51 should always be buffered as input or output Why would that be specifically so for just the Atmel 89CXX? What is particularly different about the Atmel 89CXX in this respect? What do you mean by, "the (sic) 80C31 or 80C51"? Those are just generic part numbers |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89c55 Connection with ULN2803/4 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There is a FAQ for that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MAX1232 + some NORs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| #181903 - AT89c55 Connection with ULN2803/4 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| '595 Chip /OE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pull-downs... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 89C55 connection with 2803 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why is Atmel different? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why 89CXX is different | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Advice not understood | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You didn't answer the question! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not necessarily because of AT89 | 01/01/70 00:00 |