| ??? 02/28/11 13:22 Read: times |
#181334 - Insufficient detail Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Praveen Kumar said:
For this usage, there is no problem with compilation. but, we are getting wrong results in runtime. What, exactly, is "wrong" about the results? What debugging have you done to investigate this? See: http://www.8052.com/faqs/120313 Have you paid careful attention to the requirements for code shared between banks? Are you really stuck with banking? Have you considered switching to a different processor where you would not need banking at all? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Multiple public definitions in code banking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| single const byte in code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The meaning of 'const' in ANSI 'C' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil C51 isn't a C++ compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Coding Standard Rules - Netrino | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rule #2 is a bit broken or at least incompletely formulated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| issue with #define usage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| extern const code declaration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Insufficient detail | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Conceptually wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks, it's working ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fundamental 'C' programming error! | 01/01/70 00:00 |