Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/24/10 00:49
Read: times


 
#179586 - Thats huge indeed !
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Thanks Per .

When I said 32.768Khz would yield "approx. 1 sec " , I was referring to the "actual" frequency of the crystal which may not be bang on at that frequency.

And yes that 2^47 bit time stamp does look a tad bit laaaarge for my application ;-) I will be happy with the 47 bit timer !!

Will now ask Prof Google for some "gimme code"

Raghu

List of 10 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
RTC of the C8051F410 of Silabs            01/01/70 00:00      
   this should help            01/01/70 00:00      
      UNIX time            01/01/70 00:00      
         Back to basics?            01/01/70 00:00      
            What is approx about 32.768kHz being 2^15 ticks/s?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Lots of code available            01/01/70 00:00      
               Thats huge indeed !            01/01/70 00:00      
                  32.768kHz            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Normally best solution without radio receiver            01/01/70 00:00      
                        which tolerance would you prefer, and why?? :)            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List