Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/09/10 12:49
Read: times


 		 #177182 - Answered here?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Erik Malund said:
Now I have come across a problem in that the idea of a co-operative system needs all tasks to complete before the scheduler runs again. This inevitably wastes processing time.

how can processing "waste processing time ?

It's not the processing that wastes time - it's the constraint of having to be done within a certain (arbitrary?) timeslot that causes the "waste"

See: http://www.8052.com/forum/read/177177



List of 23 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
co-operative scheduler            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: This inevitably wastes processing time.            01/01/70 00:00      
      re - Separate display processor            01/01/70 00:00      
         I see (I think)            01/01/70 00:00      
            re - Separate display processor            01/01/70 00:00      
   Separate display processor?            01/01/70 00:00      
      re - Separate display processor            01/01/70 00:00      
   how can processing "waste processing time"            01/01/70 00:00      
      Answered here?            01/01/70 00:00      
      All multi-tasking with real-time requiremens suffer waste            01/01/70 00:00      
         re - Separate display processor            01/01/70 00:00      
            Parasitic newspapers?            01/01/70 00:00      
   I do not know your "Time Triggered Prioritised Cooperative S            01/01/70 00:00      
      re - Separate display processor            01/01/70 00:00      
         what does a time interval have to do with it?            01/01/70 00:00      
         TTPCS            01/01/70 00:00      
            re- TTPCS            01/01/70 00:00      
   No need for these canned "schedulers"            01/01/70 00:00      
      re - real time system            01/01/70 00:00      
         no, it does not            01/01/70 00:00      
            re- Scheduler            01/01/70 00:00      
      Timeslice timewaste            01/01/70 00:00      
         re - real time system            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List