??? 05/21/10 09:33 Read: times |
#176110 - If that's true, then your so-called "C compiler" is BROKEN! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Eatzik T said:
i was told that in this compiler the = is as ==,
the condition of equivalent. Who told you that??! What does the compiler Manual say? if it's a mistake If it is true (which seems highly unlikely) then that is a fundamental error in the compiler! then what it does in this form? The 'C' programming language clearly defines the difference between the "=" (assignment) and "==" (comparison) operators - and this will be explained in any 'C' textbook. See also: http://www.8052.com/forum/read/176106 If your compiler really does not make any distinction between "=" and "==" then it is not a 'C' compiler! |
Topic | Author | Date |
reading two times | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: "dosent work" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: the code is something like this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Also... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: you don't say which compiler you are using | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thank for the comments! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SBUF | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the if(temp='0') lines do work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE:if | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If that's true, then your so-called "C compiler" is BROKEN! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SES51 compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
= != == in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE:again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
do yourself a favor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not necessarily![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |