Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/18/10 06:47
Read: times


 
#175993 - did you read my remark above...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
... where I told that some of the Atmel chips (e.g. AT89S8253) do have the parallel programming specs published?

Actually, for the vast majority of FLASH-based chips, as all the critical items (FLASH programming timing, high voltage generation - the 12V you need to supply is only a logic level to trigger the programming mode) are on chip, so it's none the different from the serial (ISP) programming. In most of the cases, there are no longer the issues which made the bad flavour of homebrew parallel programmers in the EPROM era; this is just that the manufacturers don't want the amateurs to tinker around.

JW


List of 19 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
programing on chip flash?            01/01/70 00:00      
   of course, you are,            01/01/70 00:00      
   parallel programming            01/01/70 00:00      
   thanks everyone            01/01/70 00:00      
      Not exactly fair            01/01/70 00:00      
      too deep            01/01/70 00:00      
         Internal voltage doublers in some chips for IAP support            01/01/70 00:00      
            hm            01/01/70 00:00      
               actually ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               why to do this? I cant understand :-(            01/01/70 00:00      
                  the Manzi book            01/01/70 00:00      
                     You mean, "Mazidi"            01/01/70 00:00      
                        agreed, and ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            ISP before IAP?            01/01/70 00:00      
               A question of driving force            01/01/70 00:00      
      baloney            01/01/70 00:00      
   programming on chip flash?            01/01/70 00:00      
      If only it were that simple...            01/01/70 00:00      
      did you read my remark above...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List