| ??? 02/06/10 14:39 Read: times |
#172947 - Agreed Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
My complaint in this particular context is not so much with the likelihood that the solderless breadboard will introduce those undesired analog parameters into the equation as with the fact that the results you get on Thursday may well be quite different than those you got on Tuesday. Especially as physically pressing a pushbutton means that you are, unavoidably, "disturbing" the breadboard! In the context of working a pushbutton, I believe it's like spitting into the wind. Indeed - it's a whole area of doubt & uncertainty that you just don't need! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Buttons - Hardware | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do double check .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Debouncing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have you considered that it could simply be the "breadboard" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I (dis)agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Relevance to pushbuttons | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Consider the objective | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agreed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that's why there's so fluid a definition for "working" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PCB's to match the contact arrangement on a "breadboard" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not exactly ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Solved: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Never discharge a cap directly by a switch! | 01/01/70 00:00 |