??? 10/09/09 15:09 Modified: 10/09/09 15:13 Read: times |
#169591 - I would give this a try... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Juan,
using a LM318 is not a good idea, because the LM318 needs higher supply voltages, +/-5V at least. If you power your circuit from a 9V battery then the supply voltage can easily drop to 7V. Also, your design is very high ohmic and by this very susceptible to hum and EMI. I wouldn't use a Greinacher circuit either, but a simple rectifier. Take care, in the original circuit from Murata there are some bugs! E.g., the discharging resistor is missing. For the comparator a CMOS type should be used, because the bipolar version shows too much input bias current. I would give the following scheme a try: The threshold voltage generation with the diode at TLC393 is tolerant against supply voltage changes. Use 1%-resistors for the two 10kOhm voltage dividers. The diodes can be 1N4148. All four Opamps of the LM324 need to be cascaded, because the LM324 is not a fast one. Shield the whole circuit and the sensor and bond the shield to signal ground. A grounded metallic wire mesh can be used to extend the Faraday cage over the sensor. Kai Klaas |
Topic | Author | Date |
Ultrasonic Measuremnt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Don't you need a load for D2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You wont see much across D2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LM339 input bias current | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bias Voltage + diode? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Threshold voltage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I would give this a try... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Greinacher voltage doubler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You have a good memory!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why use 9V | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Availability.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
True but.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Absolutely!![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Answers... | 01/01/70 00:00 |