| ??? 09/27/09 00:14 Read: times |
#169178 - That's bottom-up, not top-down. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Whenever you start with a solution, you're headed in the wrong direction.
The O/P's question wasn't a question to which ASM or HLL is a rational answer. His question was about how to communicate with the modem, and the answer to that should begin with "RTFM" or some such. Clearly he doesn't know the way the AT-command set works. That's where he should start. RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Interface between GSM modem & 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use the Search button... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about table-lookup? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cross-posting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That borders on nonsense! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Disagree (to a point) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 'C' Vs 'Asm' "Please ! Not Again!!!" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that will happen at every opportunity Richard sees | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think Richard's point... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's not the language ... it's the approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's bottom-up, not top-down. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Investigation of "prior art" is what will solve the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how .asm code will work to intrface with AT commands | 01/01/70 00:00 |