| ??? 09/26/09 12:16 Read: times |
#169157 - I think Richard's point... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... goes deeper than just 'C' (or HLLs) vs ASM.
But it has, in deed, been explored at great length already! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Interface between GSM modem & 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use the Search button... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about table-lookup? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cross-posting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That borders on nonsense! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Disagree (to a point) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 'C' Vs 'Asm' "Please ! Not Again!!!" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that will happen at every opportunity Richard sees | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think Richard's point... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's not the language ... it's the approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's bottom-up, not top-down. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Investigation of "prior art" is what will solve the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how .asm code will work to intrface with AT commands | 01/01/70 00:00 |