??? 06/02/09 06:19 Read: times |
#165735 - These are LINT Questions Responding to: ???'s previous message |
His code is not necessarily wrong. LINT by default assumes many things are wrong. Like while(1) it likes for(;;).
Some things it pints out are questionable, but OK. And other times it just does not understand the code. As in Yes that is exactly what I want it do do. In this case there is an option to allow pointers to strings to be unsigned. |
Topic | Author | Date |
PC Lint - Error 64 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
signed/unsigned | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
These are LINT Questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
First time with LINT? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fair I think | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The argument is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some examples | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
There is no such thing as a benign warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A question of dices | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LINT has to deal with C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
char != letter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Signed/unsigned char | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
signed/unsigned | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Show it!![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How to post legible source code | 01/01/70 00:00 |